also it is a misconception that muslims follow prophet muhammad (pbuh), they follow what was revealled to him and his example and what he taught in the context of submitting ones will to allah which was based on revelation to him.

farkhan can not truly state this status and therefore you cannot say what he tells you is not corrupt. as you refer to the unworthyness of flesh, you follow man which is flesh in the form of elijah, fard and faracon so are their words not unworthy as they have received no direct revelation and have not been purged of evil deeds and sin, how ever you follow them. i refer to farakan as a con as he will dispute all of this and make you believe he is right and to follow him and his ideas and interpretations, just as elijah done even though he had no authority and could not prove no authority for doing so and the only word of god he could prove was written in the quran which was not revealed to him and contradicts that he or this master fard or any new word the aspire to is any part of islam or that they are being truthfull. this is logical straight fact.