|
imported post -
09-04-05, 11:39 AM
[size=3]
DrunkMonkey makes some very good points that tend to nullify some of the points I was going to make. However, one thing I want to get clear from those who are advocating the death penalty is on what basis are you advocating it:
1. To save the taxpayer money (i.e. it cost more to keep them alive in prison).
2. To avenge the victim, and cater to the desire by the victim's family for such.
3. As a deterrent against others commiting the same crime...or crimes full stop.
4. Personal preference because there are certain categories of crime that YOU particularly detest.
Each of those basis can spring forth a major debate within themselves, because for all of them the issue is not a straight forward one.
A final question for those advocates of the death penalty. Would you personally be prepared to carry out the act as the executioner of people sentenced to death?
I cannot think of a more spiritually delapitating profession than that one. I wouldn't take it for any money.
Respect
There are those who feel that the only way to ‘prove their own worth’ is by ‘devaluing the worth of others’. You will often find that a man who is compelled to measure his substance against the substance of another, has little of substance in the first place!
|