|
|
|
Banned
|
|
Posts: 906
Join Date: May 2006
Location: , ,
|
|
|
imported post -
05-06-06, 02:15 AM
liberiangirl wrote:
Quote:
huzzah1 wrote:
Quote:
|
I read a brief article about her in a Saturday newspaper and one question kept coming to my mind...why was she ALLEGEDLY abused and not her siblings? Are her siblings more beautiful than her? All kids wet their beds so why write a book about "My bed wetting as a kid. It's mymum's fault"?
|
Quote:
|
She's a QC so she should know better than cast ALLEGATIONS about her own 72 year old mother in public. And then it hit me - she's cashing on the latest celeb fad. Write about your traumatic childhood with unsubstantiated allegations and flog it for £££££££. I dont think her mum needs this kind of stress at her age.
|
Quote:
|
And she's married to that old duffer? No surprise there - same old story.
|
Quote:
You obviously need to read some books on child abuse. It is in fact common among abused children to have siblings who were treatedfairly wellby their parents.Its simply disgusting think that some people on here are questioning whether or not this woman was actually abused. It islittle wonder why the black community has so many problems because people likelike thiswant to sit here with their eyes closed and pretend these thingsdont happen,LOL.
I've read the book also and I'm sorry but I had to question if it was all truth or not. Things in that book don't add up at all. Constance never seems to express any emtion or feeling in response to her mothers abuse, or that at least how she wrote it. Sorry, but I firmly believe constance is talk s*it at some points in that book. She's hiding things. Not once in all those years did constance ever retaliate from the awful abuse (as she writes it). Constance has some confessions.
|
|
|
 |