|
imported post -
23-12-06, 01:43 PM
I think is is about time to get down to the core of this topic.
First, there is a misunderstanding by the word usage of "touch". When people might think of this word, they might envision it in the active sense instead of the more passive sense. The "touch" of this topic is more accurately synonymous with "feel". To feel is to be receptive and to be receptive is to receive, so holistically there is one sense of reception, but in the details there are varying spheres of reception. The lowest sphere of perceiveable reception being what is called known to most as the "five senses", but these senses of the lower sphere are only physically based, but most see it as all that we do have in relation to receptional senses, but there are higher sphere senses known as extra-sensory (seen as extra to the lower sphere of senses) perceptions.
Science tries to disprove spiritual-realm "things", by only viewing them from a carnal viewpoint, but science without spirit(uality) is dead and limited science, when both are connected truly with each other and holistically congruous.
|