The BN Village - View Single Post

HLF · (#11 (**permalink**))

Apedemak wrote:

Quote:

..... Still, could emotion then be counted as a sence? Its used to judge in the same way as the others...Feeling isemotive... or would itsomehow fall into the extra-sensory category?Or is that simplythe ampflication of the standard sences?

I think this depends. By operation it can subjectively be experienced in both directions of send/receive. It is considered an aspect of consciousness, but that aspect is limited by the macro-awareness of the conscious. It is an essential part of being a true humane being, but it doesn't show up as standard for everyone equally. As an aspect, it seems as a secondary, complementary sense. Sensing someone's emotions even when they may attempt to hide it is extra-sensory, but getting "emotional" from no actual receipt of emotion from another is not extra-sensory, because it's origin is from the internal, that is due to sensitivity to emotional reaction than sensitivity to receiving/picking up the emotional energy of others. Understand the difference between the two? That difference is origin.Being able to pick it up is extra-sensory, but sending it isn't when it is a primary mode of action/reaction.

To gather the idea together better in sum, the operation of the program of emotion, both sending/receiving, is extra-sensory since both are connected as parts of a whole transit. Being emotionally reactive is not extra-sensory, but is a sign that this faculty exists within if only channeled correctly, mastering one's emotions to be open to picking up the emotions of others; so it is like reversing that process from in/out to out/in.