View Single Post
imported post
(#7 (permalink))
Old
HLF is Offline
Villager
HLF
 
Posts: 705
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tiki Village, ,
Post imported post - 10-06-07, 09:08 PM

ant wrote:
Quote:
Dr James,

I agree with HLF, the law is not Jewish, it is from God - and intended to reach out to all mankind, it was given to the Jewish people, but the moral demands of it are on all people, since what is to be known about God is plain (Rom 1:19)

Once again, Jewish people are not the sons of Yehudah nor are they the original people of the book. Judisam is a Pharisaic perversion (aka a religion) of the spirituality of Abraham, Issac and Jacob/Yisrael, which the sons of the twelve sons Yisrael suppose to uphold faithfully forever.

You know why we don't offer sacrifices, and why we do not condemn people by stoning! Yeshua fulfilled the sacrificial part of the law, and Hebrews chapters 9&10 explain this. Yeshua also told us not to judge, James tells us there is one judge and one lawgiver, and Paul writes:

[10] For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may receive what is due him for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad. (2 Cor 5:10)

If stoning people were part of actions permitted under the new covenant, some people would not have a chance to repent of their sins, but we know about the grace afforded by the new covenant, and that it is God's desire for all men to repent of their sins.

If you read Matthew 5:17-20, Romans 3:31, 1 John 5:1-5, and Revelation 12:17 & 14:12, you will see that the law still stands, though we are not under a mandatory obligation to obey every law, that was what the old covenant demanded. The new covenant is hinted at in the "Old Testament" (Jeremiah 31:31-31), and in the "New Testament" this is repeated (Hebrews 8:8-12). Note Hebrews 8:12 and compare 1 John 3:4, we must let the bible interpret itself - sin is clearly transgression of the law. However, the main difference between the old covenant and the new covenant is that the old covenant required people to do all that was required of the law from their own strength without God's continual assistance. We recognise that the Holy Spirit guides those who have been baptised into it, and enables us to do all of God's will, whether it be obedience to the law, prophecy, tongues or anything else.

Blessings...
What is up with this false Messianic doctrine? It is still elevating a man as equal to God, Yahweh. If JC was the only son of God, then who are the other sons spoken of in Genesis 6:2? --"the sons of God saw that the daughters of man were beautiful, and they took any they chose as wives for themselves." Not only that, if Yahweh did not allow Abraham to sacifice his son, what makes you think Yahweh would supposedly sacifice His "only begotten son"?Leviticus 18:21:You shall not give any of your seed to make them pass through [the fire] to Molech; neither shall you profane the name of your God: I am Yahweh. What would make it acceptable if He did not allow Abraham to do what everybody else did for their idols gods of wood and stone? It was not acceptable, yet people will not let go of that lie which they can transfer blame and responsibility to. It isn't anything but the flip-side of the coin that is Christian on the head and Messianic Judaism on the other side, it is just that one is slightly closer to the truth via the original language the OT was written in, the Divine Name of God, etc.

I am not a believer, because believing does not create any thought or pondering for/of knowledge. I am a knower, a seeker of truth and the knowledge of the One true God, Yahweh.

But are we not in the days akin to Kenan unto the days of Noah? Where man sought to fullfill his own rebellious way outside of the one commanded by the Creator? Where man decieved one another, especially those who sought for the truth when the majority of men do not seek it?
Reply With Quote