That's quite funny, but it isn't any reason for all people who believe in creationism to start questioning.

That wasn't the point. Making creationists question is irrelevent. The purpose was to show that morality or belief in goodness does not requrie a deity. Not to convince or unconvince creationists of their religion. I'm past that lol

What would be said to a creator who doesn't work in static notions of good and evil? What would happen if that creator said that good and evil are two aspects of a singular existent thing? What happens if the creator quotes the law of opposites?

All good points philosophically but none of them require a God to define morality and thus none of which negate the purpose of the thread