I've really found some fantastic books on this site, especially They Came before Columbus. I put a library loan request in today for The Destruction of Black Civilization.
I would hope to write a few novels about ancient Egypt and Atlantis. If you think The DaVinci Code was controversial, how would a book using Columbus' words to show that blacks beat him to America be received? It's an idea whos times has finally come!
I read two other books recently (Matthew Reilly's Seven Dealy Wonders and Wilbur Smith's The Quest) and couldn't finish either one of them. Reilly (who is universally assailed for hsi lack of talent) asserts in his novel that a partiucalr oracle of Uganda is white and blonde, as he tells it in the story. Wilbur Smith's Egyptian's are of course white and in both their books blacks are primitives and savages. I'll enjoy protraying whites as the brutes they are, but that's an issue for another thread.
It's refreshing that all the lies whites have told about their history (most of what whites claim about the world belongs in the fiction section anyway) are being disproven by us, who have suffered the most because of their imperial ambitions.
I read the reader reviews at amazon.com for Dr Sertima's The Came Before Columbus, and the white replies were about what I expected --whining from those who didn't have anyhting real to say, and coulldn't offere a scintilla of evidence to counter Dr Sertima. Instead they told lie after lie --my personal two favorites are that Dr Sertime was made to retract his assertions due to pressure from scholars (read:white academics). Got bad new for the white natsayers --that never happened.
The other is that the oldest existing mummy in the Americas is something like 7,000 years old (5,000 BC +/- 135yrs) while the oldest existing/known Egyptian mummy is only 5,000 years old. The point of that assanine argument was that the blacks couldn't possibly have shown the Amer Indians how to make mummies if mummymaking among Indian tribes predated mummymaking in Egypt. Well, first of all, mummymaking in Egypt goes back at least to 10,000 BC, because Egypt as a civilization (Upper Egypt/Lower Egypt as distinct national entities) predates ancient United Egpyt by several millenia --mummymaking in Egypt didn't sprount out of the sands fully-developed, it had to come from somewhere. Second, the mummies that have been found in Egypt are bo means all of them, or even a defninitive sample. Most of them ahve been found in the tombs of the kings, which is late in ancient Egyptian history, and nowhere near it's genesis, so there surely plenty of mummies out there, outside the valley of the Kings, waiting to be found. But that won't be easy because of my third point: there's a modern nation ruling Egypt today, and they severely limit excavatiosn because (and this will come as a shock to whites) the modern Egyptian govenrment doesn't consider their national heritage to be the property of whites and hence won't allow their country to be turned into one huge archaeolagical dig.
It may give cold comfort to some whites to complain about Seritma's work, but nobody has yet disproven it. In fact time has only shown him to be right. When your only knowledge of Egypt comes from classic white enthic-chauvinism, Cecil B Demillle's The Ten Commandments, and Elizabeth Taylor portraying Cleopatra (who although white, was not Egyptian, she was Greco-Macedonian, transplanted into the country after Alexander the great conquered it) then it's no wonder you shriek in horror at what Professor Serimta writes. It's also no surprise you can't refute it either.