View Single Post
(#5 (permalink))
Old
Mr. Muhammad's Avatar
Mr. Muhammad is Offline
Villager
Mr. Muhammad is on a distinguished road
 
Posts: 122
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Planet Asia
Default 24-10-07, 08:28 PM

Thank you, again, for your Answres:

RESS's Interests:
Demolition of Institutional Racism which is White Supremacy

RESS's Occupation:
Demolition of Institutional Racism which is White Supremacy


Quote:
1) What does it mean to "demolish" something?deˇmolˇish
–verb (used with object)
1. to destroy or ruin (a building or other structure), esp. on purpose; tear down; raze.
2. to put an end to; destroy; explode: The results of his research demolished many theories.
3. to lay waste to; ruin utterly: The fire demolished the area.
4. Informal. to devour completely: We simply demolished that turkey.
Quote:
Thank you.

Quote:
Quote:
2) What is "racism"?
Racism is the belief that 'Races' of people exist.
Where does this definition come from?
racˇism
–noun
1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
It is believed that Races of people exist.
Thank you.


Quote:
Quote:
3) What is "institutional" racism?
Institutional Racism is the belief system of Racism effectively organised to impact on the lives of people that have been classified by 'Race'.
This definition is not consistent with the definition you gave for "racism". One of them needs to be adjusted to align with the other.
Please highlight the inconsistency.
Your initial explanation of "racism" was:
"Racism is the belief that 'Races' of people exist."
This is not consistent with the definition you later provided. This statement contains no connotations of injustice, while the definition you provided, does.
Without the definition you provided, one might be led to believe that "institutional racism" is the "belief system that 'races' of people exist"; which, again, carries no suggestion of injustice.


Quote:
Quote:
4) How does one "demolish" Institutional Racism, which is White Supremacy?
White Supremacist ideology is neutralised by destroying trust in people classified as 'White' which will effectively demolish the system of Institutional Racism.
Has this been Accomplished?
No. This has not been accomplished yet.
If this has not been accomplished yet, then how do you know it works?


Quote:
Quote:
5) Are you doing that?
I am not relevant.
RESS activity destroys trust in White Supremacist ideology.
Are you not affiliated with RESS? If you are a part of RESS, and you are NOT relevant, then how can RESS be relevant? How does destroying "Trust" in White supremacist Ideology demolish the ideology itself?

I am not relevant.
Destroying trust in the ideology of White Supremacy neutralises the power of the ideology to impact the lives of people classified as Black / Non-White via the system of Institutional (Organised) Racism.

People may still choose to believe themselves to be 'White' and 'Supreme' but they will not have the power and the means to systematically abuse, delude, confuse, exploit and kill people they continue to believe are Black / Non-White and inferior.
So then, if a "non-white" person has no more "trust" in the ideology of White Supremacy, he or she is no longer impacted by White Supremacy? ...Can no longer be harrassed by white supremacists or falsely accused by white supremacists?


Quote:
Quote:
6) Where should Institutional Racism be attacked, at the "source" or at the "effect"?
The source of the power of White Supremacist ideology is in the trust of people classified as White.
Please explain how this is true. And, please, answer the question as asked.
Institutional (Organised) Racism must be attacked at source.
White Supremacy is effectively a religion.
As long as people believe in that religion/system/brand etc it has power.
As long as people classified as Black / Non-White believe that White people in positions of trust and authority in organisations that manage the vital resources contributed by and due to people classified as Black / Non-White, White Supremacy can retain it's power.
Have white supremacists stated that their ideology is a religion? Or, is this an assumption on your part?
I think you might need to clarify that last statement.


Quote:
Quote:
7) What defines "success" in your "occupation"?
I am not relevant.
Success is evident in the colapse of trust in people classified as White and the related colapse of White Supremacist organisations.
How does the lack of trust in white supremacist ideology "demolish" said ideology?
The objective is to neutralise the White Supremacist ideology and demolish the system of Institutional (Organised) Racism.
How can the ideology of white supremacy be "neutralized" when the white supremacists control the means by which said ideology is communicated?
Is RESS able to unseat the white supremacists from their position of power?
If, so, please explain how.


Quote:
Quote:
8) Are you "successful" in your occupation?
I am not relevant.
RESS can be said to be successful when White Supremacist ideology is neutralised and the system of Institutional Racism is demolished.
Has RESS accomplished this?
RESS has not yet accomplished the neutralising of White Supremacist ideology and the demolition of the system of Institutional (Organised) Racism.
So, then, at this point, RESS is not successful, correct?


Quote:
Quote:
9) Where is the evidence, if any, of your success in your occupation?
I am not relevant.
RESS is a tool designed to neutralise White Supremacist ideology and demolish the system of Institutional Racism and leave no evidence.
Have White Supremacist ideology and Institutional Racism been neutralized and demolished?
No. White Supremacist ideology has not been neutralised and the system of Institutional (Organised) Racism demolished
Then how is RESS any different from any other Entity which RESS is so fond of demonstrating the ineffectiveness of, when by your own admission, RESS is ineffective as well?


RM


Understanding Trauma - My New Blog Spot

Formerly Known as "One Zero Seven"
683 Posts

Last edited by Mr. Muhammad; 24-10-07 at 09:06 PM.
Reply With Quote