My first impression is that the whole arguement is based on the assumption that "God" is something separate from "Man"...some spooky, etheral Being that "exists" on some other plane or in some other dimension.

It is just as worthy of consideration to posit the possibility that God is Man, and Man is God....which of course would require consideration that there is much more to Man than we have believed or assumed.

Morality, I think, is best defined as that which serves the highest good of all. Therefore, deciding what is "moral" requires an indepth study of Creation and the Laws that govern it, and then using the knowledge gained from such study to settle on, or decide which behaviors facilitate Survival of the Whole, and which behaviors hinder or threaten the Survival of the Whole.

I wasn't particularly impressed with either Hannity or Sharpton; but the Brit's arguments can be dealt with once you get him to consider another possibility of the reality of "God".

RM