Originally Posted by abdurratln

Well, it sure is a relief to see that you understand what I have been trying to say all along. You are not as dumb as I thought. You have just been deliberately trying to mislead us here on this forum. Anyway, I am glad you finally see the Light.

It is critically important that Africans undersatand that Saint Paul is not a prophet. Therefore, it makes absolutely no rational or intelligent sense to insist that we accept his preachings as most American preachers do. I do not know anything about your personal pastor, other than what you have said here in this forum. But, I do know that the evengelical movement is predicated on the a Pauline dominant interpretation of scripture. In other words, Christians are almost always referered to the Pauline Gospels as the their first introduction to Bible reading and study. This is a Satnic like trick to get people confused before they even have a chance to see the True Message of Bible Prophesy.

Because Paul was not a prophet, his preachings cannot be taken as equal to prophesy. To be blunt about it: the Pauline Gospels are inferior to the biblical prophesies. So, those verses where he seems to compromise with slavery are inferior to those verses written by prophets. Keep in mind that a prophet is one who directly cummuned with GOD, Most Merciful, Most Gracious. The last of these was Muhammad (Peace and Blessings be upon him). According to Q ur'an and which I believe to be the Verbatim Word of GOD, Most Merciful, Most Gracious, Muhammad was the Seal of the Prophets. This means that there will never be another prophet (Peace and Blessings be upon all of the prophets).

Prior to the Pauline Gospels, everything in The Bible was compsoed by prophets and prophetesses. The big question is how come non-prophetic writings are in The Bible in the first place? Of course, the only honest answer is that blond-haired, blue-eyed, pale-skinned, half-naked manipulators added the Pauline Gospels to The Bible. Why? A lot of reasons. But mainly, it was politically difficult to convert the pagan Europeans to Christianity without compromsing with slavery. See, the ancient Romans and Greeks, the gentiles, were slavehalders. So, to avoid conflict with those powerful interests the early churches started talking about how slaves must obey their masters, etc. And, they put this into The Bible to confuse everbody. Thus, even today, un-necessary conflict exists between those who have the interests of slaveholders at heart and those who are harmed by slavery. Those who are harmed by slavery are the vast majority of humanity. Thus, America is almost always at war with little poor countries around the world: Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Cuba, Sudan, Irag, Palestine, Afghanistan, so on and so forth.


If you were an intelligent and honest Christians, which I doubt that you are, you would admit that there ias nothing in Bible prophesy to justify the current conflicts that America is engaged in. To the contrary, even Roman Catholic doctrine consider Bush's attack on Irag as unjust war. Yet, the evanglicals are just now starting to see the light: they are just now realizing that maybe this war is not the best solution to America's problems.

If you were an intelligent and honest Christian, you would seek peace with the Muslim Community, not un-necessary war. Islam has always sought peace with both Christians and Jews. Thus, every single time that conflicts erupts between Muslims and Christian and/or Jews, the Christians and/or Jews have always started the fight.