|

16-03-08, 09:46 AM
What is wrong with chosing not the have children? What is wrong with chosing not to be inpregnated for the sake that it is a 'woman's right' to produce?
Do men have the 'right' to impregnate? Shouldn't children have the 'right' to two parents? What about the financial implications and dedication involved in having children?
Is it a woman's 'right' to be forced to produce a child by a man forced to impregnate her or who impregnates her because she is 'his property' as often happened during the time of enslavement?
Many women who did not have any control over being impregnated resisted bringing children to birth by any means necessary so as not to perpetuate a system. Those women would have been looked on as resisters and something to emulate back then.
Why is it today that women are called selfish because they do not want children?
A friend of mine in a long term relationship had two children and when the youngest was about three the relationship broke down because HE wanted more children. She did not, because that was all she could afford (long term planning) financially. Now, she is having to drag him through the courts because he won't look after his two children and he was the one who wanted more.
|