Dictatorship as a model is and always has been a successful form of governance, other than those propped up by the west and other factions during the not so cold war it works well for developing nations which is why they are all too quick to drop in and vilify on those nations that adhere to it.

Makes for an efficient program for fast and steady development, simply can't have people digging up problems and gathering people against an elected leader every four years, throwing money around with expensive marketing agendas and party supported speeches, doing so on a constant basis under economic pressures only makes for a nation of self concerned and pissed off peoples.

Ultimately plays on a hunger for power offering each and every man the chance to run a country so long as he has appeal and the, ''right'' people behind him... in this world of capitalism where the majority of rich people earn and maintain their wealth in ways that most would describe as immoral outside of its given context democracy as the west would have it can only lead to high level corruption something that suits them just fine no doubt.

***