hello lady Day:
I believe you have misderstood the point I was trying to make
and it is this -

Not matter what height the father is.. if he is able to produce children he is more than capable of working to feed them.
It takes two to create a pregnancy. And if the mother is prepared to stay at home and look after the child why then should the father of the child not work to feed and clothe it?

Just because its 2009 theres no good reason what so ever for a Man NOT to be held ACCOUNTABLE for the children he fathers .

The CSA have proven themselves to be nothing short of a useless organisation
.
when a woman goes cap in hand to the Benefit office after she has given birth It should be requested that she provide details of her childs father. He will then be supplied with a NI Number and given a job to support his child.

If for any reason she does not know the identiy or the where abouts of her childs biological father then she should be given the option of supporting the child herself (there are many mothers work from home) Or if this doesnt suit Adoption. So the child goes to parents that are in a postition to care for it.

Why should the state pick up the tab? benefit should only be payable under the most extreme of circumstances ..and not as "Bog Standard" which is how it is now adays.

If the governemt take this approach.. "potential parents"will likely become more responsible. And the Condom industury will likely Thrive under such condtions and quite possibly create more Jobs! win win win!