Women Who Like To Be "Roughed-up" or "Smacked around" During Sex... - Page 4

DSP · (#76 (**permalink**))

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

DSP wrote:

Quote:

Quote:

DSP sounds like your speculation is trying hard to justify your means when the evidence is clear to see and interpret. At least to some it is anyway. Silly arguement to be bogged down with nevertheless.

It is what it is... bullsh*t 'lets fix up before it blows in our faces', and hide up under each other's cup sack for support. Not about getting bogged down, but if someone calls me stupid based on their own flawed fluid logic, I'm calling them on it.

DSP its not like you to take offence so easily, youre normally cool about everything.

And I actually would have left it alone as another one of Shemsi's 'lets see can I get them to discuss deviant sex' topics and leave it at that. But the inconsistency of their arguement coupled with accusing me of having lack of common sense on the matter was slightly annoying. I usually admit when someone has a point, but I didnt' see it here, plus the hiding up under one mans zipper didn't help either.

DSP, you are acting likea real idiot and a jerk right now. Here is the thread starter for you to read it again...

Women Who Like To Be "Roughed-up" or "Smacked around" During Sex...

...is it unhealthy? Or, is itharmless raunchiness added to sex?

Is it an indicator of other issues, or is it just not that serious (just play along)?

Both men and women give your opinions...

Where do you see anything talking about beating women? In my very next post, in respose to Kunjufu, I stated this...

...Sorry brother, but that is no fantasy of mine. I think there might be something a bit wrong with a man who would want to smack a woman around.

Furthermore, the reason I'm asking is because I know a female who wants to be roughed up and smacked around. I'm just wondering if this is something other women like too, because my initial inclination was that there was something wrong going on here.

Again, do you see anycondoning, promoting, or even encouraging beating a woman? Then a full 7 posts before the one you accuse me of being in cohoots with The Watcher (DM), Iwrote this to BIG L...

Uhhh....no, it doesn't. I'm not talking about beating women like you. You wanted to know when to beat a woman. I am talking about the opposite...sorry...

Afternot a single indication ofpunching people in the face, or any sadistic behavior like that, youstart talking shyt. Unless you can point out where I was discussing, or even implying, the sadistic behavior that isobviously congenial with your psyche, thenI would expect an apology for your slanderous remarks.

You're about as transparent as 12 oz Dasani. Don't insult peoples intelligence. I call things how I see them, which I've been doing here for a while. You're only upset because you exposed yourself now you're playing cover up.

Shemsi en Tehuti · (#77 (**permalink**))

I really thought you were more mature than that. You can't point to a single instance to support your claims, and so you result to childish insults. By the way, if the bare facts insult YOUR intelligence, then what does that really say about your intelligence? This shyt talk of yours is beneathme.

DSP · (#78 (**permalink**))

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

I really thought you were more mature than that. You can't point to a single instance to support your claims, and so you result to childish insults. By the way, if the bare facts insult YOUR intelligence, then what does that really say about your intelligence? This shyt talk of yours is beneathme.

That's my communication style, you and everyone else knows that by now. These little projection tactics to paint yourself as some objective naive pseudo intellectual who wants to grow, would work if your threads weren't so inconsistently written. You keep trying to pry a way for your useless bs sex topics. Flakey pretenders like you come a dime a dozen. Do you actually believe you are fooling anyone? I mean really.

Shemsi en Tehuti · (#79 (**permalink**))

DSP wrote:

Quote:

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

I really thought you were more mature than that. You can't point to a single instance to support your claims, and so you result to childish insults. By the way, if the bare facts insult YOUR intelligence, then what does that really say about your intelligence? This shyt talk of yours is beneathme.

That's my communication style, you and everyone else knows that by now. These little projection tactics to paint yourself as some objective naive pseudo intellectual who wants to grow, would work if your threads weren't so inconsistently written. You keep trying to pry a way for your useless bs sex topics. Flakey pretenders like you come a dime a dozen. Do you actually believe you are fooling anyone? I mean really.

[align=center]

[/align]
Here you go again, totally skirting around the facts at hand. This has nothing to do with your communication style, but everything to do with your stupid and cowardly posts in this thread. You can't prove your point so you act like a child putting up disparaging images of both The Watcher and myself. Then you put the image into your signature which is probably against BNV GUIDELINES.... , but hey, that's what children do...

DSP · (#80 (**permalink**))

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

DSP wrote:

Quote:

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

I really thought you were more mature than that. You can't point to a single instance to support your claims, and so you result to childish insults. By the way, if the bare facts insult YOUR intelligence, then what does that really say about your intelligence? This shyt talk of yours is beneathme.

That's my communication style, you and everyone else knows that by now. These little projection tactics to paint yourself as some objective naive pseudo intellectual who wants to grow, would work if your threads weren't so inconsistently written. You keep trying to pry a way for your useless bs sex topics. Flakey pretenders like you come a dime a dozen. Do you actually believe you are fooling anyone? I mean really.

[align=center]

Quote:

[/align]

Quote:

Here you go again, totally skirting around the facts at hand. This has nothing to do with your communication style, but everything to do with your stupid and cowardly posts in this thread. You can't prove your point so you act like a child putting up disparaging images of both The Watcher and myself. Then you put the image into your signature which is probably against BNV GUIDELINES.... , but hey, that's what children do...

Now aren't you being a blackpot right about now. Anyway, your image is wack. Maybe I can train you if I have time... for a fee. LOL I'm finished with this, I'll treat you like a lady and let you have the last word. After that you can crawl back under you know where.niceone.gif

Shemsi en Tehuti · (#81 (**permalink**))

DSP wrote:

Quote:

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

DSP wrote:

Quote:

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

I really thought you were more mature than that. You can't point to a single instance to support your claims, and so you result to childish insults. By the way, if the bare facts insult YOUR intelligence, then what does that really say about your intelligence? This shyt talk of yours is beneathme.

That's my communication style, you and everyone else knows that by now. These little projection tactics to paint yourself as some objective naive pseudo intellectual who wants to grow, would work if your threads weren't so inconsistently written. You keep trying to pry a way for your useless bs sex topics. Flakey pretenders like you come a dime a dozen. Do you actually believe you are fooling anyone? I mean really.

[align=center]

Quote:

[/align]

Quote:

Here you go again, totally skirting around the facts at hand. This has nothing to do with your communication style, but everything to do with your stupid and cowardly posts in this thread. You can't prove your point so you act like a child putting up disparaging images of both The Watcher and myself. Then you put the image into your signature which is probably against BNV GUIDELINES.... , but hey, that's what children do...

Now aren't you being a blackpot right about now. Anyway, your image is wack. Maybe I can train you if I have time... for a fee. LOL I'm finished with this, I'll treat you like a lady and let you have the last word. After that you can crawl back under you know where.niceone.gif

You just keep proving how stupid your argument is, because I had the first word, and even without saying anything I already had the last word because you didn't say anything and still have failed to show how anyone was talking about sadistic sexual behavior. You are a pathetic individual.

DSP · (#82 (**permalink**))

Shemsi en Tehuti wrote:

Quote:

Kunjufu wrote:

Quote:

Sorry but this is a male fantasy that women loved to be smack around.....

...Sorry brother, but that is no fantasy of mine. I think there might be something a bit wrong with a man who would want to smack a woman around.

Furthermore, the reason I'm asking is because I know a female who wants to be roughed up and smacked around. I'm just wondering if this is something other women like too, because my initial inclination was that there was something wrong going on here.

If its just harmless sex? .... aahhh nevermind

Nothing else needs to be said...

***dies with laughter***

Shemsi en Tehuti · (#83 (**permalink**))

Again...just pathetic....

FredB · (#84 (**permalink**))

Shemsi said 'Damn it Fred...I am usually with you on your posts, but you are really reaching here. I was not "airing" anything in this thread. I simply asked a question whether or not women who liked rough play was an indication of something else that was wrong. No one is even "promoting"spanking or anything else. I am not exposing any sexual fantasies here, and the discussion of whether or not it indicates a psychological problem has more to do with assessing a person's character and absolutely nothing to do with the consciousness of an individual. Sorry Fred, but you are on a bit of a high horse here...you really need to get off of it, or just don't say anything...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

And there I was defending you on the other thread not knowing what was going on. Hmmm. High horse. Language is a fascinating subject. Well I suppose it could be pereived as such dependening where your standing or sitting and where I am standing or sitting and the fact you may generally agree with me means nothing. You and I are of different generations and nationalities and with different cultures. So sorry if your pop American culture is offensive to some of us. Yes at least i have a horse and not a mule...

What this has nothing to do with conciousness and I suppose I should take your statement as something of value? No brother I think I am more culturally qualififed to cast negative opinion in changes in culture than you. People who live long enough can guage changes in culture more easily than those who are born into it and that is a sociological fact.

Let me educate you as I doubt on this issue you can educate me. Go and read one of the greats the US has produced Professor Maulan Ron Karenga and his brilliant analsyis of cultural change in America. You may not know he like myself is trained in cultural anthropology before becoming a political scientist. Read and understand what Kawaida theory is about and what it means. Understand what the man says when he describes contemporary African American culture as based on five connections eg the money or cash connections, sex connection, exploitation etc.

Nothing to do about conciousness as if your conciousness is high enough or sufficiently developed enough to tell me that..Brother you must be smoking Columbian gold or some sh*t. As Karenga said in the area of relationships is that we are no longer concerned for the whole person in a holistic and healthy way but only parts of them which is used and abused in an exploitative manner. When we post threads such as this we are reducing black women to body or sex parts or things for sex not treating or respecting them as human beings..

You would stand up in a concious political organisation or circle and take up this discussion about does anybody know women who like rough sex and to be knocked about. No bro you do not frequent them circles because if you did you would know how offensive and irrelvent this topic is. And you still want to insist this has nothing to do with conciousness. A book to go and read...Unity and Struggle by Cabral if you want to know what revolutionary conciousness is about. You think those brothers or other cats I know in the ANC.PAC, NJAC and other serious hard core brothers and you could take that discussion with them before you get an intellectual slapping down and education about your morals, value and priorities son...

And you want to tell me this has nothing do do with conciousness? Are you going to also tell me that it is not surprising that this type of sh*t is posted generally by those in the US anda few of their wannabe counterparts in the UK? What is it some coincidence that you would not dare post this sh*t on an African or Caribbean website and you think that has nothing to do with values and conciousness?

Is it any coincidence that the brother I mentioned in the example who was born in the Caribbean and spent most of his life there and comes back wanting to discuss urinating on women or being pissed on by them as some turn on and something worthy of discussion with decent people.

Bro if you are born and live so deep in the sh*t you can't see it say so. But don't step out of your place and your rank to tell me about I am sitting on my high horse because at least I have a horse to sit and view the sh*t around me. Its call African/Caribbean culture. Some have it some don't.

And by the way in the struggle officers or rank and calibre sit on horses while squadies like you are on foot. Remember that. We earn the right to sit on high horses because we are consistent and proven....and such shit would never come from our mouths...Because the best solidiers live by their code and creed.

FB

DSP · (#85 (**permalink**))

FredB wrote:

Quote:

Shemsi said 'Damn it Fred...I am usually with you on your posts, but you are really reaching here. I was not "airing" anything in this thread. I simply asked a question whether or not women who liked rough play was an indication of something else that was wrong. No one is even "promoting"spanking or anything else. I am not exposing any sexual fantasies here, and the discussion of whether or not it indicates a psychological p