The BN Village  
Home Register FAQ Members Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the African and Caribbean Social network.

You are currently are in guest mode which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access other features. By joining this free African Caribbean Social utility you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload images, add videos, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, join the African and Caribbean community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go Back   The BN Village > Welcome to The Black Forum - The Black net Village > News and Politics Village
Reload this Page SHARPTON'S ANCESTORS OWNED BY S. THURMOND'S ANCESTORS....

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
imported post
(#26 (permalink))
Old
Bacoo is Offline
Excluded
Bacoo
 
Posts: 1,281
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 02:44 AM

TheDogon wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:

Quote:
I enjoy reading your N****rish fantasy, the make believe world you create in your mind. Its quite funny. Imaging anything your monkey azz write riles anything but laughter is true fantasy.
Quote:
If you harness that imagination for something productive you might make something of yourself other than being a servant for your master.
Quote:
Carry on son.
Quote:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!


What thehell is wrong with you littleblack-faced sambos??? Dude, I was only jokingwith you. You can't take a joke. You get all serious and start sweating. Dag...I was only calling you an obedient,koonish, backwards, rice-eating buffoon.
Quote:
Quote:
It wasn't like I was insultingyouor anything.I was just makinga joke. Now you have went and got all riled up. Why don't you take that chip off your shoulder, you people don't want to forget the past. Shoot. . .some of my best friends are self-hatingwhite wannabees. Ain't nothing wrong withit, I guess.
Quote:
Quote:
I ain't a racist or nothing. I don't have a racist bone in my body. Negroes ain't bad people. I just don't mix with them that's all. I don't believe in that kind of stuff.
Quote:
Your hallucinating boy, nothing serious here but some serious laughter.
Quote:
Leave the drug alone.


Quote:
Quote:


Quote:
Quote:












Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement Sponsored links

imported post
(#27 (permalink))
Old
TheDogon is Online
Villager Senior
TheDogon
 
Posts: 1,998
Join Date: May 2006
Location: , , USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 02:49 AM

Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
TheDogon wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:

Quote:
I enjoy reading your N****rish fantasy, the make believe world you create in your mind. Its quite funny. Imaging anything your monkey azz write riles anything but laughter is true fantasy.
Quote:
If you harness that imagination for something productive you might make something of yourself other than being a servant for your master.
Quote:
Carry on son.
Quote:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!


What thehell is wrong with you littleblack-faced sambos??? Dude, I was only jokingwith you. You can't take a joke. You get all serious and start sweating. Dag...I was only calling you an obedient,koonish, backwards, rice-eating buffoon.
Quote:
Quote:
It wasn't like I was insultingyouor anything.I was just makinga joke. Now you have went and got all riled up. Why don't you take that chip off your shoulder, you people don't want to forget the past. Shoot. . .some of my best friends are self-hatingwhite wannabees. Ain't nothing wrong withit, I guess.
Quote:
Quote:
I ain't a racist or nothing. I don't have a racist bone in my body. Negroes ain't bad people. I just don't mix with them that's all. I don't believe in that kind of stuff.
Quote:
Your hallucinating boy, nothing serious here but some serious laughter.
Quote:
Leave the drug alone.

Dag. . .I swear, you little buckwheat backwards babboon. I was only making a joke.Here you are all upset. Ain't nothing but some words,man.
Quote:
Quote:
Take it easy,have some watermelon, eat some rice. Put that damn strawhat back on.
Quote:
Quote:
Dag. . .damn negroesis crazy.
Quote:
Quote:
If we knew you people would be this much trouble, us "Black" folks would have picked the cotton all by ourselves.
Quote:
Quote:
Geez!!



“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning.

http://www.covenantwithblackamerica.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#28 (permalink))
Old
Bacoo is Offline
Excluded
Bacoo
 
Posts: 1,281
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 02:55 AM

I [img]http://www.godless*******.com/user/GB%20Ann%20Coulter%20&%20Al%20Sharpton.jpg[/img]

I wonder if Rev. Slick Al. next publicity stunt will be to sue the Thurmond estate for his reparations check and buy a new custom pimp caddy??


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#29 (permalink))
Old
Bacoo is Offline
Excluded
Bacoo
 
Posts: 1,281
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 02:59 AM

TheDogon wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
TheDogon wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:

Quote:
I enjoy reading your N****rish fantasy, the make believe world you create in your mind. Its quite funny. Imaging anything your monkey azz write riles anything but laughter is true fantasy.
Quote:
If you harness that imagination for something productive you might make something of yourself other than being a servant for your master.
Quote:
Carry on son.
Quote:
BWAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAA!!!!


What thehell is wrong with you littleblack-faced sambos??? Dude, I was only jokingwith you. You can't take a joke. You get all serious and start sweating. Dag...I was only calling you an obedient,koonish, backwards, rice-eating buffoon.
Quote:
Quote:
It wasn't like I was insultingyouor anything.I was just makinga joke. Now you have went and got all riled up. Why don't you take that chip off your shoulder, you people don't want to forget the past. Shoot. . .some of my best friends are self-hatingwhite wannabees. Ain't nothing wrong withit, I guess.
Quote:
Quote:
I ain't a racist or nothing. I don't have a racist bone in my body. Negroes ain't bad people. I just don't mix with them that's all. I don't believe in that kind of stuff.
Quote:
Your hallucinating boy, nothing serious here but some serious laughter.
Quote:
Leave the drug alone.

Dag. . .I swear, you little buckwheat backwards babboon. I was only making a joke.Here you are all upset. Ain't nothing but some words,man.
Quote:
Quote:
Take it easy,have some watermelon, eat some rice. Put that damn strawhat back on.
Quote:
Quote:
Dag. . .damn negroesis crazy.
Quote:
Quote:
If we knew you people would be this much trouble, us "Black" folks would have picked the cotton all by ourselves.
Quote:
Quote:
Geez!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#30 (permalink))
Old
TheDogon is Online
Villager Senior
TheDogon
 
Posts: 1,998
Join Date: May 2006
Location: , , USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 03:02 AM

Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
I [img]http://www.godlessb**tard.com/user/GB%20Ann%20Coulter%20&%20Al%20Sharpton.jpg[/img]

I wonder if Rev. Slick Al. next publicity stunt will be to sue the Thurmond estate for his reparations check and buy a new custom pimp caddy??
Quote:
Well strawhats, being barefeet, and wearing overalls are not so popular anymore, my negro.
Quote:
I know you think it looks cute, but most "Black" folks don't roll that way.
Quote:
Quote:
Again, don't take this the wrong way. I ain't saying that you people can't dress the way you like. I am just posting here at the forum. So take it easy.
Quote:





“If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning.

http://www.covenantwithblackamerica.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement Sponsored links

imported post
(#31 (permalink))
Old
Gmahogany. is Offline
Villager Senior
Gmahogany. is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Posts: 1,084
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 03:03 AM

Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
Gmahogany. wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
Gmahogany. wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
I dont see anywhere that is say anything about Black slave owners being the most prolific. You should peep the Ohio State University Black Studies Library, they have an extensive collection of material us can use to enlighten yourself.

But of course if ALL you seek is info to feed your VICTIMOLOGY then that is all that you will find.
Prolific was my word. Not only was it not prolific, it was negligible, at best and I don't have to visit the OSU Black STudies library to know this. I don't have to read a book/watch a documentary, of some"scholar" talking out of their ass about some sh*t they conjured up or got 3rd or 4th hand. I know it because I am a DESCENDANT of the people who LIVED the sh*t. I live among other DESCENDANTS of the people who lived the sh*t. If it happened in any significant way, it would have been present in the HUNDREDS of FIRSTHAND slave accounts that were transcripted and recorded after slavery.TheLIBRARY of Congress, has them were you can read and or listen to them. It would have been present in the stories and the folklore of the slaves. It would have been present in the stories of the former slaves who went on the lecture circuit after slavery to tell their stories(Sojurner/Harriett/Frederick/Booker T Washington, etc). It would have made it's way down through family histories and general scuttlebutt/gossip. Hell, even the fact that SOME African chiefs particpated in the selling of Blacks is found in the folklore of the slaves, in stories like the King Buzzard tale. So even if CRACKER scholars didn't say that was so, I would KNOW it was so, because the people who LIVED it, said it wasso.Talk of BLack people being slavemasters is non existent in these accounts, and it would not be, if there was any significant particpation of Black folks owning and working slaves, the way crackers did.

You're talking like these people didn't have the opportunity to TELL their own stories in their own words. Thankfully, they DID get to tell their own stories, so Cracker and cracker apologists couldn't twist their experience around and VICTIMIZE them a SECOND TIME.....

The final way that I KNOW this occurence was negligible, is that througout slavery when white folks were defending it against abolitionists and anti-slavery crusaders, they pulled whatever they could out of their ass to JUSTIFY the institution. If this phenomenon was true, it would have been the FIRST thing out of their scumbucket/lying mouths. "how bad could slavery be if BLACKS are participating as owners in significant ways?" THEY never even tried to use that angle or make it the cornerstone of the proslavery argument. That tells anyone with common sense, all they need to know.


Whatever feeds your victimology and your inferiority complex, more power 2 ya!!

Im happy 4 U
I have an inferiority complex? To borrow from your too often used phrase, BWAHAAHAHAAA. ROTFLMBAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Hardly. I don't give a sh*t whether you're happy for me, or whether you accuse people who were VICITIMIZED of having the audacity to see themselves as being...well......ummmm....vicitimized? Imagine that. It's very telling that YOU think that having been vicitimized and acknowleging that, makes one inferior/means that one has an inferiority complex(very crackeresque, actually,"i 'm going to sh*t on you, but i dont' want u to ever talk about the fact that i sh*tted on u,so what I sh*tted on you?, get over it, as a matter of fact in time, i'm going to tell people that I really didn't sh*t on u, at all, or that you enjoyed being sh*t on by me, or that others from your family joined in with the sh*tfest,,or that YOU actually sh*tted on me", lol.....),but that's your issue.I just refuse to let anyone, be they Tom Negro, Cracker, or Cracker agent/apologist, LIE on my folks. That's all. Carry on.



Acknowledging that there were Blacks who owned slaves and had their own plantations is lying on your folks??

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

ROTFLMBAO!!!
LOL. No, Bacoo, Acknowledging that there were Blacks who owned slaves is not lying on my folks. I acknowledged that, in my initial response to you. Trying to act like that was even REMOTELY the typical scenario, during slavery, is where the lying comes in. There were Jewish people who particpated helping Nazis do dirt to Jews, but if you ever try to fix your mouth to imply that this was anything close to the most common/typical scenario,ortry to minimize/dismiss what was done to them BY THE NAZIS, (whichis usually what people are trying to do, when theytry toimply that the abberation was the norm, and do the whole " but some Blacks/Jews did xyz to their own),you'll likely get shot.

As I said before, Black slaves THEMSELVES passed down stories of OTHER Black folks(who sometimes became slaves THEMSELVES, which illustrates theabsurdity of harping on that and implying that the phenomenon u speak of could have EVER been anything more than rare)particpation in SELLING them to Crackers, which after a generation or so here, was a distant memory to them, yet we are supposed to believe that they neglected to talk about Black folks OWNING other Black folks, DURING slavery which was very much their PRESENT day reality. It doesn't hold water. NOt to mention the fact that Southern Crackers, even now are jealous and envious towards Blacks, , but particularly then, would burn a ******'s whole house down or several ******'s houses down , if they even THOUGHT you had 2 nickels more than them;much less sit by and watch you "ballin" on your sprawling plantation with all your wealth and splendor, while they were barely making it. One of the quickest ways for a Black person in the South to incur the wrath of Crackers, was to say or do ANYTHING, that made it look like you were trying to put yourself on the level of a white man. Speaking properly, looking them in the eye when talking to them, etc, other petty, minor,silly shit like that. Picture them sitting by while a ******, got rich off of owning ******S, and flaunting that wealth in the midst of struggling and poor crackers, orwell to do crackers, for that matter, and being fine with it.These situations would HAVE to have been anomalies, for MYRIAD reasons. THAT, was my point.

My position is not even that some of us would not have wanted to do it. Then, as now, there are those among us who live to imitate white folks. There were those among us then, who didn't have a problem with slavery itself, just had a problem withour position IN the institution, wanted a better place on the planation. A distinction that people like Malcolm, and my man Nat Turner made.Nothings changed, nothing strange. I'm saying they would not have been ALLOWED to do it, in any widespread way. It ain't even in the DNA of Southern white folks, to let something like that go down. Furthermore, slavery was NOT just about a business proposition. Black folks in GENERAL were categorized/treated/viewed as less than human, separate and apart from slavery, in states that didn'teven have slavery, and long after slavery no longer existed. There was SYSTEMIC/STRUCTURAL institutionalized INFERIORITY, cosigned /backed by the Federal Government, Supreme Court, etc. So the idea that a Black person would have been free to move around and do the same shit that a white person could do( do it for long, at any rate), be viewed/treated the same way, is absurd. It would have upset the whole social order, PARTICULARLY in the South, and those mutherphuggers fought tooth and nail to maintain that SOCIAL ORDER/RACIAL/******S MUSTBE MADE TO STAY IN THEIR PLACE, HIERARCHY(while the whole world watched),well into to the friggin 1960's, so you do the math.




"Tina is aware that Ike passed away..... No further comment will be made."- Tina Turner's agent
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#32 (permalink))
Old
Bacoo is Offline
Excluded
Bacoo
 
Posts: 1,281
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fairfax, Virginia, USA
Post imported post - 08-03-07, 03:13 AM

Gmahogany. wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
Gmahogany. wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
Gmahogany. wrote:
Quote:
Bacoo wrote:
Quote:
I dont see anywhere that is say anything about Black slave owners being the most prolific. You should peep the Ohio State University Black Studies Library, they have an extensive collection of material us can use to enlighten yourself.

But of course if ALL you seek is info to feed your VICTIMOLOGY then that is all that you will find.
Prolific was my word. Not only was it not prolific, it was negligible, at best and I don't have to visit the OSU Black STudies library to know this. I don't have to read a book/watch a documentary, of some"scholar" talking out of their ass about some sh*t they conjured up or got 3rd or 4th hand. I know it because I am a DESCENDANT of the people who LIVED the sh*t. I live among other DESCENDANTS of the people who lived the sh*t. If it happened in any significant way, it would have been present in the HUNDREDS of FIRSTHAND slave accounts that were transcripted and recorded after slavery.TheLIBRARY of Congress, has them were you can read and or listen to them. It would have been present in the stories and the folklore of the slaves. It would have been present in the stories of the former slaves who went on the lecture circuit after slavery to tell their stories(Sojurner/Harriett/Frederick/Booker T Washington, etc). It would have made it's way down through family histories and general scuttlebutt/gossip. Hell, even the fact that SOME African chiefs particpated in the selling of Blacks is found in the folklore of the slaves, in stories like the King Buzzard tale. So even if CRACKER scholars didn't say that was so, I would KNOW it was so, because the people who LIVED it, said it wasso.Talk of BLack people being slavemasters is non existent in these accounts, and it would not be, if there was any significant particpation of Black folks owning and working slaves, the way crackers did.

You're talking like these people didn't have the opportunity to TELL their own stories in their own words. Thankfully, they DID get to tell their own stories, so Cracker and cracker apologists couldn't twist their experience around and VICTIMIZE them a SECOND TIME.....

The final way that I KNOW this occurence was negligible, is that througout slavery when white folks were defending it against abolitionists and anti-slavery crusaders, they pulled whatever they could out of their ass to JUSTIFY the institution. If this phenomenon was true, it would have been the FIRST thing out of their scumbucket/lying mouths. "how bad could slavery be if BLACKS are participating as owners in significant ways?" THEY never even tried to use that angle or make it the cornerstone of the proslavery argument. That tells anyone with common sense, all they need to know.


Whatever feeds your victimology and your inferiority complex, more power 2 ya!!

Im happy 4 U
I have an inferiority complex? To borrow from your too often used phrase, BWAHAAHAHAAA. ROTFLMBAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Hardly. I don't give a sh*t whether you're happy for me, or whether you accuse people who were VICITIMIZED of having the audacity to see themselves as being...well......ummmm....vicitimized? Imagine that. It's very telling that YOU think that having been vicitimized and acknowleging that, makes one inferior/means that one has an inferiority complex(very crackeresque, actually,"i 'm going to sh*t on you, but i dont' want u to ever talk about the fact that i sh*tted on u,so what I sh*tted on you?, get over it, as a matter of fact in time, i'm going to tell people that I really didn't sh*t on u, at all, or that you enjoyed being sh*t on by me, or that others from your family joined in with the sh*tfest,,or that YOU actually sh*tted on me", lol.....),but that's your issue.I just refuse to let anyone, be they Tom Negro, Cracker, or Cracker agent/apologist, LIE on my folks. That's all. Carry on.



Acknowledging that there were Blacks who owned slaves and had their own plantations is lying on your folks??

BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

ROTFLMBAO!!!
LOL. No, Bacoo, Acknowledging that there were Blacks who owned slaves is not lying on my folks. I acknowledged that, in my initial response to you. Trying to act like that was even REMOTELY the typical scenario, during slavery, is where the lying comes in. There were Jewish people who particpated helping Nazis do dirt to Jews, but if you ever try to fix your mouth to imply that this was anything close to the most common/typical scenario,ortry to minimize/dismiss what was done to them BY THE NAZIS, (whichis usually what people are trying to do, when theytry toimply that the abberation was the norm, and do the whole " but some Blacks/Jews did xyz to their own),you'll likely get shot.

As I said before, Black slaves THEMSELVES passed down stories of OTHER Black folks(who sometimes became slaves THEMSELVES, which illustrates theabsurdity of harping on that and implying that the phenomenon u speak of could have EVER been anything more than rare)particpation in SELLING them to Crackers, which after a generation or so here, was a distant memory to them, yet we are supposed to believe that they neglected to talk about Black folks OWNING other Black folks, DURING slavery which was very much their PRESENT day reality. It doesn't hold water. NOt to mention the fact that Southern Crackers, even now are jealous and envious towards Blacks, , but particularly then, would burn a N****r's whole house down or several N****r's houses down , if they even THOUGHT you had 2 nickels more than them;much less sit by and watch you "ballin" on your sprawling plantation with all your wealth and splendor, while they were barely making it. One of the quickest ways for a Black person in the South to incur the wrath of Crackers, was to say or do ANYTHING, that made it look like you were trying to put yourself on the level of a white man. Speaking properly, looking them in the eye when talking to them, etc, other petty, minor,silly sh*t like that. Picture them sitting by while a N****r, got rich off of owning N****rS, and flaunting that wealth in the midst of struggling and poor crackers, orwell to do crackers, for that matter, and being fine with it.These situations would HAVE to have been anomalies, for MYRIAD reasons. THAT, was my point.

My position is not even that some of us would not have wanted to do it. Then, as now, there are those among us who live to imitate white folks. There were those among us then, who didn't have a problem with slavery itself, just had a problem withour position IN the institution, wanted a better place on the planation. A distinction that people like Malcolm, and my man Nat Turner made.Nothings changed, nothing strange. I'm saying they would not have been ALLOWED to do it, in any widespread way. It ain't even in the DNA of Southern white folks, to let something like that go down. Furthermore, slavery was NOT just about a business proposition. Black folks in GENERAL were categorized/treated/viewed as less than human, separate and apart from slavery, in states that didn'teven have slavery, and long after slavery no longer existed. There was SYSTEMIC/STRUCTURAL institutionalized INFERIORITY, cosigned /backed by the Federal Government, Supreme Court, etc. So the idea that a Black person would have been free to move around and do the same sh*t that a white person could do( do it for long, at any rate), be viewed/treated the same way, is absurd. It would have upset the whole social order, PARTICULARLY in the South, and those mutherphuggers fought tooth and nail to maintain that SOCIAL ORDER/RACIAL/N****rS MUSTBE MADE TO STAY IN THEIR PLACE, HIERARCHY(while the whole world watched),well into to the friggin 1960's, so you do the math.
Quote:
Sorry to disappoint you but nowhere did I write that Blacks owning slave was the typical scenaro. YOU are the only one writting that bit of text in this thread.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!