The collusion of female exclusionin the church did not come from GOD but rather from the mouth/mind and heart of men {i.e. Jews and Gentiles, specifically}. So old has been this practice that no one has ever questioned its origin, roots or validity--until now.

The contents of the bible are so "ambiguous" that anyone can use its words to prove or disprove their own profane claim[s]:

GOD is satisfied with his works
Gen 1:31
GOD is dissatisfied with his works.
Gen 6:6

GOD dwells in chosen temples
2 Chron 7:12,16
GOD dwells not in temples
Acts 7:48

GOD dwells in light
Tim 6:16
GOD dwells in darkness
1 Kings 8:12/ Ps 18:11/ Ps 97:2

GOD is seen and heard
Ex 33:23/ Ex 33:11/ Gen 3:9,10/ Gen 32:30/ Is 6:1/
Ex 24:9-11
GOD is invisible and cannot be heard
John 1:18/ John 5:37/ Ex 33:20/ 1 Tim 6:16

GOD is tired and rests
Ex 31:17/ Jer 15:6
GOD is never tired and never rests
Is 40:28

The ancient traditions and customs of men have long banned women from preaching. This biblical pattern of bashing women started with the fable of Adam and Eve and ended with Mary Magdalene. Therefore, it was not God but men who painted the fable of Eve & Mary Magdalene as negative profiles of the female spirit. It is not GOD but men who have discredited women and knocked them down from their rightful place beside the male.

Since "our" own dark ages or slavery roots the ability to think as we once did was mentally shut when the first hijacked shipment of Afrikans took place as they were involuntarily shackled and dragged onto this rock called AmeriKKKa. A huge portion of the black populace is oblivious to the fact that their current belief system was created inside the minds of the Black Ancient People known as Egyptians whose theosophy provided a shared/equal role in their spiritual belief for both men and women. This concept was good enough to cull, glean, copy, edit and re-translate; but not good enough to accurately incorporate into the Eurocentric mindset. And therein lies the problem. In fact this Euric thought--created by the Roman Catholic Church (i.e. Nicea Council/325AD) is totally dysfunctional. How can the worship of a male, male, male trinity rather than a male, female child trinity be spiritually functional or wholistic? Spirituality exists within a shared male, female and child essence.

It was the Roman Catholic Church who diabolically condemned/changed/killed/demonized/disman tled/demoralized the "original" concept of male and female interaction in early Xtianity. This dogma was neatly protected by death/intimidation/persecution/deletion/c ensorship:

------------------------------------------------

*The scholarly works by the men listed below were either condemned, deleted, burned or silenced:

Andreas van Maes
Bonfils of Damascus
Isaac de la Peyrere
Richard Simon
Spinoza
William Robertson Smith

...because these [6] in particular revealed truths that the Roman Catholic Church wanted silenced in order to "ensure the continued survival and propagation of the lying lore of Christianity."*

------------------------------------------------

Hence today modern churches accept this false doctrine without question.

In a previous post entitled "Hypatia: The Martyrdom of Womanhood" I addressed thru research the inhumane mistreatment of a Ancient Black African Egyptian Scholar who refused to accept Xtianity and was slaughtered. This is just one example; I know there are many.

The female essence in spirituality is hidden under the many layers of the Khemet belief system [(Ausar)ian Religion. Worship was in pairs: to every male deity there was a female deity to match. This highly refined-visible nature and political standing of women is evidenced by the number of female Pharoahs:

1. The first 'female' known to be pharoah: Meryt-Neith (1st Dynasty c3000bc)
2. Nitocris (6th Dynasty 2148-44BC)
3. Sobeknofru (12th Dynasty ?1757-1759BC)
4. Hatshepsut (18th Dynasty c1473-1458BC)--Yes, with certainty she did rule as Pharoah.
5. Neferitit (18th Dynasty 1336BC) possible, but not certain.
6. Twosret (19th Dynasty 1187-1185BC)
7. Cleopatra (51BC)

IMHO, Buried beneath the foundation of religion lies this ignorance or lack of a basic female component inside the equation of spirituality. This innate behavior is inherent in the disrespect-disdain that mankind exhibits towards womankind.
--------------

Source:

*Dr. Alex Darkwah --The Africans Who Wrote The Bible --page 5

http://www.mccormick.edu/news/black-chris tian-21stcentury

http://www.freewebs.com/exposing-xia....htm%5B/URL%5D

http://www.religioustolerance.org/nfe_bibl.htm

http://www.ancientnile.co.uk/pharaohs-women.php

http://www.netherworld.com/~walkerk1/feminist3.html

http://www.rootswomen.com/articles/T...le_Sexism.html

--------

Glossary

1. ambiguous--open to more than one interpretation.

2. crutch--support used by the injured or disabled as an aid in walking "spiritually".

3. diabolicially--characteristic of evil, wicked, cruel.

4. essence--intrinsic or indispensable properties that serve to characterize or identify something.

5. fact--knowledge or information based on real occurrences.

6. false doctrine--untrue, fake body of principles.

7. hijacked--to rob, steal, seize.

8. mentally--in the mind.

9. oblivious--lacking all memory; forgetful; conscious awareness; unmindful.

10. preach--to reveal the deep truths of GOD's prophecy.

11. profane--act of disrespect.

12. shackled--physical bound by a fetter or manacle.

13. spiritual--related to the "hidden" force within.

14. theosophy--religious philosophy about the nature of the soul based on mystical insight into the nature of GOD.

Funny I was talking to a brotha whosedaughterhas been offered the roleof Shool Prefect but she's feelingreluctantand would rather be with the crowd. I told hm the irony is deep dwn the crowd all wished they were her.

Ifevil menhave devisedall these linesto defend their own hypocrisy and to hide their own insecurties, there is never a shortage of women to followthat lead.

I believe spirituality brings you to God, God does not bring you to spirituality i.e you have it or you don't. Many church going peoplesee it as an excuse to have a fashion show, it's more like a routine ritual than any spiritual calling.

The amount of women who finally join the church after their fake existence lets them down is unreal. Got too many sheep and no where nearenoughshephardesses - far easier tojoin the 'I need another pair of shoes' click!

Right you are!

Right? debateable, Opinionated? definitely!... a bit like saying you are Fine!

Incognito said: Right? debateable, Opinionated? definitely!... a bit like saying you are Fine!

clp)Yep, that's me--all three opinionated, fine and debatable!clp)

--------------------------------------

HLF said: The spiritual truth is thatmale and female essence was never really separated in the spiritual sense, the physical sense is a different story, but one thing religion is very good at is separation.

I say: Religious assertion is:Father, Son, Holy Ghost -- Male, Male Male. -- totally dysfunctional.

I'll even venture to saythe collusion to write females out of the limelight wasintentional.

[shadow=red]If GOD breathed life into "the Adam" and "the Adam" became a living soul you had better bet that a woman gave birth to him![/shadow]

Initial conception, HLF?

I was being facetious, really. -- The Adam and Eve story is purely allegoric white wash to me, I've read "The Isis Papers" soI know better.

@HLF

You are indeed a very wise and deeply analytical young man.

-----------

HLF said: Yeah, I know. I was lookingat this ordealinitially from a spiritual perspective, but physically for black folks there is indeed a singular origin, unexplained, unknown or unpopular.

IMHO, the 'majority' ofblack folks have no idea of the singular nor plural origin of religion. They've accepted--since slavery, what was hand fed by their pseudo-spiritual advisors rather than making an informed decision thru deligent research.

HLF said:"We've always been here" is enoughfor most people, but I think black people should have some understanding and knowledge of their inital origins.

I agree.

HLF said: We (as a melaninated people) sharea very highpercentage of DNA, yet there is no duction that there wasn't a singular source of origin even for us?

I agree.

HLF said: That's not making a real connection for me.


And, it is obviously this lack of connectivity ismissing from blackfolks-at-large...

HLF said: Please explain your perspective of it being allegoric white wash.

This myth of theAdam and Eve (well,Lilith was his original mate) relates to thepsychologically hidden fact that:

Let's tell the truth. White People are ashamed of their white skin -- which is indirectly associated with leprosy and albinoism.They were wise enough to change the creation story though{i.e. even telling it x2 in two distinctly, different versions} and even wiser to project "the false idea" of inferiorblack skin; while secretlyworshiping and envying the 'perfect black' in the same breath--whew! total psychological dementia!

Indeed, there is a problem and it hasnever been with blackfolks. Our inability to grasp the fact{i.e. whether intended or no} that we are indeed the genetically superior culture {i.e. melanination is the key} is MIA {i.e. possibly due toleft over remnants of slave mentality}

HLF said: "Do youthink it was perverted from it's original context?"

Yes. -- http://www.netherworld.com/~walkerk1/feminist3.html

HLF said: Whynot share your perspective on the Isis Papers.I've looked into various accounts tosee what was new additions tothe biblical text through the Dead Sea Scrolls and the HebrewBible, which checks out.

Dr. Frances Cress-Welsing, is definitely before her time.In addition to her intuitive insight on the color issue in our socieity and how the concept affects "people activity" she unknowingly prophecied the "Katrina" genocide ofthousands of blackfolks.

Christians will not be reading her book--because they've been brainwashed to stop at the bible {i.e. basic instructions before leaving earth}.The knowledge thatthe Christian symbol {i.e. thecross} isa phallic symbol of the black man's castrationwould not sit well with most blackfolks. The fact isthepaganholiday:Xmas is a celebration by whites of their continued 'genetic' survival on this planet would sendblackfolks in a tail spin; though they spend billions every year in support of this false practice.

When I hear black scholars like Dr. Welsingapplaud such people as Dr. JohnHenrik Clark and Dr. Cheihk Anta Diop I know they are on the right track...

HLF said: If blacks, africans, melaninated (so many names for one) people originally wrote the first "bible", then why would theynot document their own origin rather than anothers?

Documentation is primary an external characteristicof Euro-Western Civilization. In African Civilization theseprogenitors{i.e. the Dogon Tribe, The Yoruba, The Lemba Tribe and last but not least the Akan Peoples--just to name a few}retainedfromtheir "original" descendants the ability of "intuit".

--How it amazes so-Called Euro-Western learned men that the Dogon Tribe knows more aboutthe cosmos than they do. They are astounded to the point of racist criticisms.

--How it amazes so-Called Euro-Western learned men that the Yoruba have so deftly incorporated metaphysic into Ife/Ifa. They are so astounded to the point of calling this practice "voodoo".

--How it amazes so-Called Euro-Western learned men that The Lemba Tribe is the original {i.e. I hate to use the word Jew/Hebrew/Semite here because these words are euphemistic, not linguistic} progenitors of Judaism.

Afrikans {i.e. even those of us on this rock who though not borne in Africa--Africa is borne in us)learn from the inside out....

Euro-Western Civilization learns from the outside in....

I hope this discourse is meanful to you HLF!






"A photo of the Negro Brotherhood Of Seville, Spainorganized in 1677 -- long before the KKK ever existed, which means the KKK is counterfeit."

Source:"100 Facts about the Negro w/Proof" by JA Rogers