Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justavoice
This is an interesting thread.
|
I think it borders on sacrilidge
Quote:
|
Like I wrote in a prior thread, If people would look at the teachings of Islam, they would see it as gaping holes in it.
|
Name one.
Quote:
|
When I read the beginning thread, just like "Meknow" my first question was "who is WE"
|
English is a very limited mode of thought. The ancient texts make little sense to us in English for this very reason. In some of the romance languages, French for instance, the plural is used to denote royalty. We seldom hear this in English. However, if we study it clsoely, we will notice that the royal plural is also used in Ebglish.
I use it it often because I am the head of a family. When I am speaking in this capacity, I always use the plural form. Also, as head of an organization, I always use the plural form. If you pay close attention to U. WS. presidents when they speak they often use the plural form. They mean to refer to this goivernment or to the whole of the Americam polity. There is no there there.
Quote:
|
Now i'm not one to laugh at people because i think it is rude, so when I laugh in this instance, know that i am not personally laughing at any individual more than I am laughing at ISLAM, Its Quran and its so called prophet.
|
No insult is intended. But, I think you are showing your ignorance.
Quote:
|
So in this manner I treat Islam and those that believe it, whilst making reference to the true word of God, to give this lying book called the Quran some substance.
|
Here we go agian. Nobady has called the BVible a "lying book". So, I want you to be aware that should you go to a Muslim country and end up facing 40 laces, etc. you are wrong for this insult.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Really time is far spent, you need to put down this unholy book "the Quran". The prophets of old did not play when it came to heresies, and what disturbs me about todays followers of Christ is how they buy into political correctness and will not come against this teaching.
|
Were not the Christian Crusades enough? How about the Spanish Inqusition? What about WWI? There have been attempts agaisnt Islam throughout history. There is nothing new about the sentiment you express. What bothers me is that so many Christians seem to be slow learners. They keep trying and keep gettin their behinds kicked. But, they keep trying. In fact, all of the sectarian conflicts that come to mind were started by Christians. And the Christians were defeated in each and every one of them. Now, this farce against Irag and Afghanistan will end no differently. Any student of history will think twice before starting this kind of foolishness. But, Americans have been so brain-washed as to imagine that they can somehow win this time. I do not think so. Slow learners.
Quote:
|
I'm not even talking about terrorism and all that people want to put with Islam, as to me it is just but another form of racism being played out. However it is much more complex game at play, because the teaching does not add up, when placed beside other teachings from the books of the prophets and patriarchs. A real discussion is not being had about this belief system.
|
|
|
Maybe you cannot count. They "add up" as far as I can see. Show us where they do not "add up".
05-12-07, 12:25 AM
Linear Mode
