I just had a chance to listen to one of the interviews. I would love to talk to this bredder.

In this first interview there was an interesting point that he made in reference to Jesus and sex. He makes the assumption it seems to me that sex is a sin. which is not true and because Jesus was not married and did not have sex therefore it was His will that we not be sexual beings.

This is absolutely untrue.

In Genisis God told Adam and Eve to be fruitful and multiply as the first commandment or close to without looking. So how could bredder say that Jesus was against sex except out of wedlock. Which is kept would keep a lot of trouble down.

I plan to listen to all of them.

Bump

.....................

[quote]For once, I agree with you. You are not as dumb as you look. There is nothing in Scriptures to indicate that Jesus (Peace and Blessings be upon him) was not married. In fact, there appears to be indisputable evidence that he had children. There are recently discovered artifacts that seem to support this possibility.

This anti-sex thing is just another indiation of the extent to which pagainism has entered into Christianity. It is a back dorr way to allow homosexualism and sexual immorality to be accepted.

Exactly. All this non-sense about reproducing without a man and woman has never made sense. Homosexuals are the ones who seem to think that it can be done otherwise. Is that brother a homo?

From the sheep to the shepherds in any following you have different levels of consciousness...Mutabaruka is of the higher echelons when it comes to the mind behind rastafarianism so can be forgiven for the one or two holes that can be picked from his argument - kind of know what he wants to say and appreciate the difficulties in trying to break down certain intricacies to others on different levels of consciousness when everything the hear is deciphered and interpreted on their level and not the level in which it was delivered.

In a world where everyone is boss at least it gives room for stimulating debate albeit at the expense of common consensus.

Not smoking weed clearly gives him an edge deciphering realities from myth.