The BN Village  
Home Register FAQ Members Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Welcome to the African and Caribbean Social network.

You are currently are in guest mode which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access other features. By joining this free African Caribbean Social utility you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload images, add videos, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, join the African and Caribbean community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Go Back   The BN Village > Welcome to The Black Forum - The Black net Village > The Village Square.
Reload this Page Black expatriate effort?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
imported post
(#1 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 02:22 AM

Backpacker: i'm curious why are you here, further what is the point of this thread.. and lastly why would you imagine that anyone of us here would be dumb enough to follow the questionable principles that led a flock of misguided ex slaves to believe they could go back to Africa to help their 'heathen' 'backward'brothers..

Ps; i'm curious as to how after but a mere few minutes you can arrive at the conclusion that there is a 'fundermentalist' and 'racist' views here...on what pray tell was this discovery based on?


African heart, African mind

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement Sponsored links

imported post
(#2 (permalink))
Old
Prince Hakeem's Avatar
Prince Hakeem is Online
Super Moderator
Prince Hakeem is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Posts: 6,465
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Where mi deh
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 04:42 AM


@backpacker

Why don't you go on Stormfront and question the white posters about their own racism since you care so much about this issue? You claim that there's a lot of anti-white sentiments on here. My answer to that is: Deal with it!! This is a BLACK forum and one of the few mediums that we actually use to vent our feelings without censorship, so no, we're not going to hold back. You coming on here isn't going to make the slightest bit of difference at all. Most of the time we only talk about issues pertaining to US, not YOU. I personally don't hold you people at the centre of my existence and neither do most posters. You should be complaining to your fellow brethren who not only make far more racist statements on their messageboards, but who also put their racism into practice.

And you can save your lame "if you don't like it here then go back to where you come from" bullshit because I don't hear you people saying that to your white brothers and sisters in Zimbabwe and South Africa. This country was built on the backs of our own hard labour and expertise, so no we WON'T leave and we're here to stay!!

Also you said to a fellow poster:





Aside from your pitiful grammar (or perhaps you just think it makes you really 'black' as opposed to me, 'white'), do you not think this statement is bordering on racist?



Look at the racism in your own statements. To me, you're just another smartarsed white boy who thinks he can come on here and get cute with other posters while pretending to want to engage in meaningful debate. Your kind always gets thrashed with the quickness and then suddenly disappears and comes back under a different username a few weeks later.

While other posters may try and converse with you, I'll never be civil towards an outsider who thinks they can get away with insolence. I be one of them 'Uppity N*ggers' that your kind can't deal with.

p.s. - Just to remind you: If you decide to get a bit too big for your britches, whether you're a registered member or not doesn't make a difference. You can still be banned regardless. (Somehow I get the feeling you're just one of the old white posters from the old BN forums in disguise carrying over baggage as a result of being demolished)




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#3 (permalink))
Old
Prince Hakeem's Avatar
Prince Hakeem is Online
Super Moderator
Prince Hakeem is an unknown quantity at this point
 
Posts: 6,465
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Where mi deh
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 05:08 AM

Kunjufu wrote:
Quote:
Forumers: its my view that we ought not to waste any more time on this fool...Its fairly obvious that like Gemini, he is here merely to divert and distract our energies let the fool finish playing with himself..This is our forum and if he don't like it we let him go scratch!!!

Ps: the only that surprises me is that Gemini aint here yet to blindly agree with this fool..
[quote]Good advice. I don't even know why I bothered to type my previous post.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#4 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 05:11 AM

Forumers: its my view that we ought not to waste any more time on this fool...Its fairly obvious that like Gemini, he is here merely to divert and distract our energies let the fool finish playing with himself..This is our forum and if he don't like it we let him go scratch!!!

Ps: the only that surprises me is that Gemini aint here yet to blindly agree with this fool..


African heart, African mind

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#5 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 05:22 AM

backpacker wrote:
Quote:

Prince Hakeem,


So you admit that there is 'anti-white sentiment' (let's just call it racism shall we, since you're agreeing with what I said earlier -- and you're right). Then you justify this by saying that this is a black forum. You are implying that black people are racist (as if you actually speak for all black people... ). That's one silly move, you just did the debate equivalent of stepping on a landmine.

FYI, I have actually been banned a number of times on stormfront.org.I would never compare this forumto that bunch ofhateful freaks, although it does have certain members...


Anyway, goodnight all, it's 3am in China and I've just downed a bottle of wine.
Quote:
[line]
Quote:
Prince Hakeem; Just to clarify the backpacking fool maybe right you cannot possibly speak for ALL Africans, however the facts still stands that this is OUR site, OUR space to talk we talk.. If the Backpacking fool finds us RACIST, so what If he dislikes our TONE so what, if he's OFFENDED I say f.uck off and leave us be...
Quote:
Just to underline the point so even this pillock will get it, YOU (by that i mean this white person or the european community in general,) do not matter and nothing you think or say holds any sway here... so go away be happy in China and keep drinking with the hope you get liver poisoning.. This board sir is about US for US and if you don't like our tone I think the word is TOUGH!!!!! gotit getit good now naff off you plonker..
[quote]









African heart, African mind

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement Sponsored links

imported post
(#6 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 05:38 AM

backpacker wrote: [quote]Sorry, can't resist, this is like shooting fish in a barrel, pretty sad actually:

"YOU (by that i mean this white person or the european community in general,) do not matter and nothing you think or say holds any sway here..."

So, somebody's ethnicity determines whether what they say is important or not on this forum, as stated by a moderator. What a wonderful message you are sendingto Britain's multicultural society.Oh dear. Black racists.



[line]


Ok are you happy now you've got one over on us poor stuuupid black racist, i have to say i feel really told now..thank you..


African heart, African mind

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#7 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 06:07 AM


Liberia, the oldest republic in Africa, was once regarded by the West as the continent's most stable, prosperous, and peaceful country. One of only two African countries never colonized by a European power (Ethiopia is the other), Liberia's modern political foundation was built by free blacks who sailed there from the United States in the early 19th century. Since then, relations between Liberia's indigenous peoples and the African American settlers have rarely been easy. After more than 130 years of Americo-Liberian — dominated single-party rule, the First Republic was ended by a military coup in 1980, after which an unstable government faced a series of insurrections. Following a second revolt in 1989, throughout the early 1990s Liberia suffered from political chaos, civil unrest, famine, and violence. Some experts estimate that about 10 percent of Liberia's population died during that period, while another 80 percent was dislocated.

EARLY HISTORY
Anthropologists now believe that Liberia's first inhabitants were hunter-gatherers, and ancestors of the Gola and Kissi peoples, both of whom are part of the Mel language group. They were joined by the Kruan people (the Kru, Kuwaa, Bassa, Kran, and Dei ethnic groups) who were migrating from the north and east, and later, around the 15th century, by people of the Mande language group, among them the Gio, Mano, Loma, Bandi, Mende, and Kpelle.

Traders from the savanna kingdoms of West Africa visited Liberia's early communities, seeking spices, gold, and ivory. In the 15th century, trade began to turn toward the coast, as European merchants came seeking Malaguetta peppers, gold, and, later, slaves. The chiefdoms of the Mande- and Mel-speaking groups in what is now northern Liberia met demand for slaves by forging alliances and conducting raids on neighboring peoples. Other exports included rice, palm oil, and textiles. In return, the indigenous peoples received European firearms, knives, jewelry, and liquor.

AMERICAN SETTLEMENT AND THE COMMONWEALTH

In addition to soliciting funds from the U.S. government, the ACS began selling memberships to free American blacks, many of whom were farmers, professionals, or small businessmen. Memberships (which were lifelong, and did not necessarily mean that the holder planned to go to Africa) cost $30; one ACS agent estimated that by 1825 they had raised "not less than $50,000" through membership sales. In claiming that this money went into "the treasury of the Lord," the agent revealed the religious basis for much of the ACS's work; many colonizationists, black and white, were motivated at least in part by the desire to spread Christianity.

In 1820 the group launched its first ship, the Elizabeth, which sailed with more than 80 African American emigrants. After landing on the coast of what would become northwestern Liberia, many of the first arrivals died of tropical diseases to which they lacked immunity, and the group retreated to Freetown, Sierra Leone. In 1821 more settlers arrived and founded a town at Mesurado Bay. Controlled by ACS governors (all white until 1842) and supported by the U.S. military, in 1824 the Americans named their first settlement Monrovia, after U.S. President James Monroe, and the colony itself Liberia, from the Latin liber, meaning 'free.' They adopted a Plan of Civil Government and began negotiating treaties with indigenous chiefs to expand their territory and ensure the settlers' safety.

Over the next decade, state colonization societies continued to sponsor the emigration of free blacks to Liberia, and the population of Americo-Liberians grew to around 3000. In 1838 they formed the Commonwealth of Liberia, and in 1839 adopted a constitution based on that of the United States.

Relationships between the settlers and the indigenous population were often strained. Liberian law excluded "tribal" people from most jobs and schools, and attempted to impose Christian practices upon them through such means as outlawing work on Sundays. In addition, the settlers (most of whom were artisans or semi-skilled workers) had begun to establish a caste-like system, in which the most wealthy and well educated formed an elegant and sheltered elite. But unlike Africa's European colonies, Liberia had no color bar that divided long-time inhabitants from newcomers, and thus it was possible (though difficult) for Africans to enter settler society. Moreover, intermarriage and informal multiple-marriage arrangements — as well as the children born to such unions — helped swell the Americo-Liberian population.

THE FIRSTREPUBLIC
Compared to other African nations, independence came early for Liberia. Partly because of Americo-Liberian resistance to ACS authority, and partly because of the complexity of the colony's status in regard to European traders (who refused to recognize Liberia's power to regulate their activities), on July 26, 1847, the Americo-Liberians declared their independence from the ACS. They elected Joseph J. Roberts, the first nonwhite ACS governor, as president. Roberts, who served for eight years, oversaw the founding of Liberia University, in Monrovia, and helped expand the boundaries of the new country, most often through treaties with local ethnic groups.

In the second half of the 19th century, Liberia began to receive diplomatic recognition from other nations, including the United States, Haiti, and Germany. Divisions between various factions of the Americo-Liberian community led to the establishment of two political parties, the Republicans and the True Whigs (both based on American parties of that era). Starting with the 1870 election of Edward James Roye, the True Whig Party (TWP), which was almost exclusively Americo-Liberian, became the dominant force it would remain for 110 years.

The early years of Liberian independence saw continued tensions between Americo-Liberians and indigenous peoples, who still held lower-class citizenship rights. These tensions resulted in rebellions by a number of groups, including the Kru Confederation in 1856, and the G'debo Kingdom in 1875. In 1873 the Liberian government extended some legislative representation to the indigenous peoples, thus somewhat calming the political waters. Historians estimate that the interior regions of Liberia, the areas most dominated by indigenous Liberians, were not truly under the central government's control until the 1920s. But the new nation also faced external threats from British and French colonizing powers at the end of the century.

Following the economic model of the American South, the settlers opted for plantation-style agriculture to produce sugarcane and coffee, often employing Africans liberated from slave ships. But they faced stiff competition from other producers of these commodities, and persistent economic shortfalls forced the new nation to seek foreign loans. Support from the United States and Great Britain was reciprocated by Liberia's acting as an African base for Allied armies during World War I, after Liberia declared war on Germany in 1917. After the war, foreign industries began arriving; the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, which began operations in 1926, eventually became the country's largest private employer. In 1929 the American-led League of Nations investigated allegations of government-tolerated forced labor at the Firestone plant, a charge that led to the resignation of Liberian President Charles D. B. King.

The 1944 inauguration of William V. S. Tubman continued the unbroken chain of True Whig presidents. His 27-year-long tenure was characterized by openness to foreign investment, close ties with Western powers, and a gradual opening of political (though not economic) opportunities to previously disfranchised people. Under Tubman, the administration of the interior regions was finally brought under the control of the central government. In addition, Tubman extended the vote to women in 1945 and to indigenous people in 1946, though Americo-Liberians continued to enjoy a representative advantage in the legislature.

Upon Tubman's death in 1971, his vice president of 19 years, William R. Tolbert Jr., assumed the presidency. In what some historians see as an effort to distinguish himself from Tubman, Tolbert attempted to reach out to the growing populist movement while maintaining support of the old-line establishment. Not surprisingly, both sides soon expressed distrust. Tolbert's foreign policy mixed the familiar dependence upon the United States with new aims, such as establishing relations with the People's Republic of China and helping raise money for the antiapartheid movement in South Africa. For most Liberians, however, the more immediate concern was the domestic economy, which in the late 1970s was squeezed between declining world prices for Liberia's primary exports (rubber and iron ore) and rising import costs. Popular discontent over increasing food prices culminated in the 1979 Rice Riots, led by the Progressive Alliance of Liberians (PAL) and the Movement for Justice in Africa (MOJA).

SAMUEL K. DOE, CHARLES TAYLOR, AND CIVIL WAR
On April 12, 1980, Samuel K. Doe, a master sergeant in the Liberian army, led 17 men to Tolbert's home and assassinated him. The men, former members of the People's Progressive Party, called themselves the People's Redemption Council (PRC) and declared themselves in charge of the government. Doe staffed his administration with fellow members of the Krahn ethnic group, and pledged that his military rule would last only temporarily. A new constitution (written by Dr. Amos Sawyer, a University of Liberia professor who had been involved with MOJA) was approved by voters in 1984, and Doe promised that elections would be held the following year. But from the beginning Doe faced challenges from former PRC accomplices — who led at least two failed coup attempts — and when he and his newly formed National Democratic Party of Liberia (NDPL) won the 1985 elections, they were suspected of widespread vote fraud. Doe invited increasing charges of tribalism when he took revenge on the coup plotters by burning and sacking the towns of his rivals' ethnic groups.

A pattern of quick turnover and unexplained deaths in Doe's administration, coupled with heavy restrictions on press freedoms, prompted the United States to send in advisers in 1987 as a condition for continued foreign aid. Liberia's economic woes had heightened tensions throughout the country, and these had in turn strained relations with neighbors such as Sierra Leone and Guinea, which feared an influx of refugees. These fears, in fact, were justified. In late 1989 a group called the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL), led by Charles Taylor, a former government official facing arrest for corruption charges, launched an insurrection in Nimba County, on the border of the Côte d'Ivoire. Liberians fleeing the NPFL spilled into neighboring countries, while shipments of smuggled arms crossed the borders in the opposite direction. Facing a threat to regional stability, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) intervened in 1990, sending its multinational peacekeeping force (ECOMOG) to secure control of Monrovia. Much of the rest of the country, however, was controlled by Taylor's NPFL.

Peace talks were held in The Gambia in August 1990, but Taylor, who shortly thereafter declared himself the true president of Liberia, did not attend. Dr. Amos Sawyer was chosen as president of the so-called Interim Government of National Unity (IGNU). Meanwhile, a breakaway rebel group led by Prince Yormie Johnson had made surprising inroads into Monrovia, and in September assassinated Doe. ECOMOG ultimately secured the capital again, but the hinterlands were still controlled by Taylor.

The next opposition force to enter the fray, the United Liberation Movement of Liberia for Democracy (ULIMO), led by Johnson, included some of Doe's former supporters. It crossed the border from Sierra Leone in 1991, and clashed repeatedly with Taylor's NPFL troops. Fighting continued and intensified as ECOMOG, attempting to subdue NPFL in the interior, retreated to Monrovia in 1992. Reports began appearing of NPFL's numerous human rights abuses, including the drafting of preteenaged boys as soldiers and the wholesale execution of civilians. The first half of 1993 was characterized by repeated skirmishes among ULIMO, the NPFL, and ECOMOG, which by then had abandoned its peacekeeping role and become an active combatant. After the breakdown of a July 1993 cease-fire, the United Nations established an observer mission in Liberia; at the same time, several new factions emerged, many of them based on ethnic affiliations, and most of them armed.

THE COUNCIL OF STATE, 1997 ELECTIONS, AND BEYOND
Throughout the mid-1990s the major factions met in various configurations, their attempts at peacemaking prompted by the threatened removal of ECOMOG troops (which now included soldiers from Nigeria, Ghana, the Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso, and Togo) and the implication that even more widespread war would result. As the UN Security Council increased its number of observers, each attempt to build coalitions failed. At an ECOWAS-sponsored meeting in Nigeria in August 1995, the combatants signed a peace accord, agreeing on plans for a council of state that would last until free elections could be held. Professor Wilton Sankawulo was pronounced chairman, with the main factional leaders, including Taylor, also serving.

Further hostilities plagued the council of state, including fighting between Taylor's forces and the predominantly Krahn defenders of the Doe regime, who had thrown their support behind Johnson's ULIMO. In August 1996, Ruth Perry, a 57-year-old former senator, was chosen to replace Sankawulo as council chair, becoming the first African woman head of state in modern times. Following the reorganization of the council, elections were scheduled for July of 1997. In a field of 13 political parties, Taylor's National Patriotic Party prevailed, awarding Taylor the presidency he had sought for nearly eight years. Within months of the election, several of Taylor's political rivals were found dead under suspicious circumstances.

Fifteen years of civil strife and warfare weakened Liberia's economy, which had been in decline even before Doe's 1980 coup. Before the war, about half of Liberia's population lived in the countryside; subsistence farming and the export of iron ore, wood, and rubber were the dominant economic activities. Liberia had also long maintained a large shipping fleet due to its "open registry" policies for foreign ships. But the war, in addition to creating a huge refugee population and destroying the homes and businesses of hundreds of thousands of Liberians, disrupted rural food production. By 1997 the country was heavily dependent on food aid, and many regions faced a severe food shortage. The only people to benefit from the years of turmoil were the leaders of the armed factions who took advantage of the opportunity to make deals with foreign firms for diamond mining in the country's interior.







Contributed By: Kate Tuttle


African heart, African mind

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati Share On Face Book!Stumble this Post!
Reply With Quote
imported post
(#8 (permalink))
Old
Kunjufu's Avatar
Kunjufu is Online
BNV Managing Editor
Kunjufu has disabled reputation
 
Posts: 16,269
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Belly of the beast, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Kunjufu
Post imported post - 04-01-04, 06:13 AM

Quote:
"Our policy with respect to the continent of Africa at best has been a policy that is inconsistent and incoherent," said NAACP Executive Director Kweisi Mfume, in Miami Beach last weekend for the organization’s annual convention.
Quote:
"We've looked away in many instances because Africa was not politically correct or politically cute." Mr. Mfume is wrong. United States policy towards sub-Saharan Africa has been consistent since August of 1960, when President Eisenhower ordered his national security team to arrange the assassination of Congolese leader Patrice Lumumba.
Quote:
Congo had been nominally independent from Belgium for only two months, yet Eisenhower, far from looking away from Africa during his last months in office, was already embarked on a relentless policy of continental destabilization, one that has been fundamentally adhered to by every U.S. President that followed. U.S. policy in Africa is anything but “incoherent.” Rather, too many of us have “looked away” from the clear pattern of U.S. behavior and intent – a ferocious, bipartisan determination to arrest African development at every opportunity and by all possible means – including the death of millions. War on African civil society Belgians murdered Prime Minister Lumumba on January 17, 1961, no doubt with the collaboration of Eisenhower’s men. Lumumba presented a danger to European and American domination of post-colonial Africa precisely because he was not a tribal figure, but a thoroughly Congolese politician, a man who sought to harness power through popular structures.
Quote:
As such, Lumumba personified the threat of an awakened African civil society – the prerequisite for true independence and social development. A popular and long held belief among Africans and African Americans is that the prospect of continental (or even global) African “unity” is what terrifies Washington, London and Paris. We wish that were true. However, the neocolonial powers know they have nothing to worry about on that score, having begun the era of “independence” with a clear understanding among themselves that conditions for meaningful unity would not be allowed to develop.
Quote:
African civil society itself would be stunted, hounded, impoverished – rendered so fundamentally insecure that, even should “leaders” of African countries band together under banners of “unity,” few could speak with the voice of the people. Only leaders of intact civil societies can unite with one another to any meaningful effect – all else is bombast, and frightens no one. Tribalism is, indeed, a problem in Africa. For Americans and Europeans, it is an obsession – the game they have played since the Portuguese planted their first outposts at the mouths of African rivers in the 1400s.
Quote:
However, there are limits to the effectiveness of tribal manipulation. Many “tribes” are very large – nations, actually. Setting one tribal group against the other, while suppressing the social development of each, is a tricky business. The colonizer must not to allow the “favored” group to accrue, through privilege, sufficient social space to aspire to nationhood. In that event, the formerly favored group must be crushed by the colonizer’s own military force – a brutish and costly business.
Quote:
These are generalities, and Africa is a big place. Numerous colonial powers at different times employed the full mix of coercion, manipulation, favoritism, and raw (including genocidal) force. After World War Two, and for a host of reasons, the colonial arrangement had become untenable. Europeans would continue to engage in tribal manipulation in the new political environment, while the U.S. preferred bullets and bribes as it assumed overlord status among the imperialists.
Quote:
However, it was clear to the old masters – and especially to Washington – that the formal structures of independence would inevitably lead to the growth of dynamic civil societies that could impede the operations of multinational extraction corporations and agribusiness. Civil societies can become quite raucous and demanding, even in countries in which there are tribal divisions. Therefore, the process of African civil development had to be interrupted, not only in those new states that were economically valuable to Europe and the U.S., but in all of Africa, so that no healthy civil model might emerge. If this could be achieved, there would be no need to fear the actions of assembled heads of African states – an irrelevant gaggle of uniforms and suits, standing in for nations, but representing no coherent social force.
Quote:
Assignment: crush the people To thwart the growth of civil society in newly independent Africa, the imperialists turned to the Strong Men. It is probably more accurate to say that the imperialists invented the African Strong Man. Although both the neocolonial masters and the Strong Men themselves make a great fuss about indigenousness – albeit for somewhat different reasons – these characters arise from the twisted structures of colonialism. Their function is to smother civil society, to render the people helpless. Joseph Desire Mobutu is the model of the African Strong Man. He was an American invention whose career is the purest expression of U.S. policy in Africa.
Quote:
With all due respect to the NAACP’s Kweisi Mfume, there was nothing “inconsistent and incoherent” about Mobutu’s nearly four decades of service to the United States. From the day in August, 1960 when Eisenhower ordered the death of Lumumba (Mobutu, Lumumba’s treasonous chief of the army, deposed his Prime Minister the next month and collaborated directly in the murder) to his death from cancer in 1997, U.S. African policy was inextricably bound to the billionaire thief. It can be reasonably said that Mobutuism is U.S. African policy.
Quote:
Mobutu and nine U.S. Presidents (Eisenhower through Clinton) utterly and mercilessly poisoned Africa, sending crippling convulsions through the continent, from which Africa may never recover. With borders on Angola, Zambia, Tanzania, Burundi, Rwanda, Uganda, Sudan, the Central African Republic, and Congo (Brazzaville), and a land mass as large as the U.S. east of the Mississippi, Mobutu’s Zaire was an incubator of never ending war, subversion, disease, corruption and, ultimately, social disruption so horrific as to challenge the Arab and European slave trade in destructive intensity. Mobutu’s reign began in the heyday of European soldiers of fortune, allies of his like “Mad Mike” Hoare. By the time of his death, more than 100 mercenary outfits operated in sub-Saharan Africa, safeguarding multinational corporations from the chaos that Mobutu and his American handlers labored so mightily to foment.
Quote:
So integral have mercenaries become to Africa, a number of Black governments depend on them for their own security, forsaking any real claim to national sovereignty. This, too, is the legacy of U.S. African policy. (American mercenary corporations garner an ever-increasing share of the business.) Millions died in Zaire-Congo and neighboring states as a direct or indirect result of policies hatched in Washington and executed by Mobutu – and this, before the genocidal explosion in Rwanda in 1994, leading to an “African World War” fought on Congolese soil that has so far claimed at least 3 million more lives, belated victims of the policies dutifully carried out by America’s African Strong Man.
Quote:
Bush cultivates more Mobutus For 43 years U.S. governments have empowered Strong Men to do their bidding in Africa. The geography and riches of Congo-Zaire allowed Mobutu to wreak continent-wide havoc on Washington’s behalf, while growing fabulously rich. However, many lesser clients have been nurtured by successive U.S. governments, their names and crimes too numerous for this essay. They and Mobutu’s outrages are the logical product of the neocolonialist program. The actors come and go, but the underlying design remains the same: to prevent the emergence of strong civil societies in Black Africa. The Strong Man’s job is to create weak civil societies.
Quote:
Weak and demoralized societies, supporting fragile states hitched to the fortunes of the Strong Man and his circle of pecking persons, pose little threat to foreign capital. The African Strong Man model suits the purposes of European imperialists and the United States, perfectly. Their overarching concern– especially since the collapse of the Soviet Union – is for the multinational mineral and petroleum-extracting corporations – what Europeans and Americans are actually referring to when they speak of their “national interests” on the continent. Representing himself and a small base of supporters/dependents, the Strong Man can be counted on to bully civil society into steadily narrowing spaces, snuffing out all independent social formations, while at the same time stripping the society of the means to protect itself outside of his own, capricious machinery.
Quote:
The nation itself atrophies, or is stillborn, as in Congo. Where nations have not had the chance to take full root or have been deliberately stunted, the Strong Man wraps the thin reeds of sovereignty around himself, denying the people their means of connectedness to one another, except through him. The state is a private apparatus and – from the standpoint of civil society – there appears to be no nation, at all. The people act, accordingly – that is, they do not act as citizens of a nation. Thus, the Strong Man’s most valuable service to the foreign master is to retard and negate nationhood through constant assaults on civil society. What is commonly described as American “neglect” of Africa is nothing of the kind. Over the course of the decades since the end of formal colonialism, the governments of the corporate headquarters countries have arrived at a consensus that a chaotic Africa, barely governed at all, in which civil societies are perpetually insecure, incapable of defending themselves much less the nation, is the least troublesome environment for Western purposes.
Quote:
The extraction corporations in Africa feel most secure when the people of Africa are insecure. In Congo and Liberia-Sierra Leone, this unspoken but operative policy has plunged whole populations into Hell on Earth. African Americans typically criticize the U.S. for failing to treat Black lives as valuable – in other words, Washington is accused of neglecting the carnage in Central and West Africa because of racism. The reality is far worse than that. American policy is designed to place Africans at the extremes of insecurity, in order to foreclose the possibility of civil societies taking root. This policy has always resulted in mass death. Moreover, the U.S. did not simply sit idly by while genocide swept Rwanda and “World War” wracked Congo. Instead, the American government initially thwarted a world response to the Rwandan holocaust, and has prolonged the carnage in Congo through its two client states, Uganda and Rwanda, which have methodically looted the wealth of the northeastern Congo while claiming – falsely, according to a report to the UN Security Council – to be protecting their own borders. Uganda’s list of “proxy” Congolese ethnic armies reaches into every corner of Ituri province, where “combatants…have slaughtered some five thousand civilians in the last year because of their ethnic affiliation,” according to a Human Rights Watch report. “But the combatants are armed and often directed by the governments of the DRC [Democratic Republic of Congo], Rwanda and Uganda.” (“Ituri: Bloodiest Corner of the Congo,” July 8.)
Quote:
Zimbabwean officers have also plundered the country, but have been involved in far less killing in their role as protectors of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) government. Angola and Namibia also went to the Kinshasa regime’s aid. The United Nations and African countries labored for five years to untangle the mix of belligerents – with only the most pro forma cooperation of the United States. Prolonging “Africa’s World War” Had the U.S. wanted to end or at least scale down “Africa’s World War,” there is no doubt that Washington could have reined in Rwanda and Uganda, who received a steady stream of American military and economic assistance during the conflict.
Quote:
The Congolese (DRC) government, on the other hand, has suffered under severe sanctions from both the U.S. and the European Union. It would have cost Washington far less than a billion dollars in bribes to quarantine “Africa’s World War” – slush money for a super-power, and a fraction of the bribes Washington was willing to pay for favorable votes on Iraq at the UN. Instead, the U.S. provided aid to key combatants. That’s not a lack of policy, nor is it indifference. In the larger scheme of things, Washington believed that prolonging a war that weakened and debased Africa was in its “national interest.” Uganda and Rwanda have reciprocated, shamelessly. “Recently Uganda publicly backed the U.S.-led attack on Iraq, defying the African position to endorse a UN-sanctioned war,” reads the current message of the official State House website of President Yoweri Kaguta Museveni’s government, in Kampala. Rwanda’s Ambassador to the U.S., Zac Nsenga, was even more obsequious when presenting his credentials at the U.S. State Department, May 8: “The Rwandan Government reaffirms its commitment to join forces with the United States and the free world to combat acts of terrorism wherever it rears its ugly head. The events of the 1994 Genocide and September 11th has taught us that we have to stand together as Nations to defeat these evil acts against humanity.
Quote: