70% OF WOMEN IN bOTSWANA AREHIV POSITIVE

Lady Aleisha wrote: http://www.afrol.com/articles/15067
Remember that "Aids" is a syndrome, that is, it is a blanket term to describe a whole potpourri of different unrelated diseases, lumped together under the "Aids umbrella".
The more diseases that are grouped under the label of Aids, the more it appears that an epidemic has occurred.
In Europe and the USA, the clinical signs and symptoms of the various disease entities are strikingly different, as compared to those in Africa.
In the former cases, the prevalent Aids diseases are pneumonia, candidiasis, mycobacterial infections, Kaposi's sarcoma, dementia, and some 20 other diseases.
In Africa, it is fever, diarrhea, and tuberculosis.
These African Aids diseases occur 10 times more often, in Africa, than they do in the United States.

So when some one dies of the above ailments they just group it as aids!!! its bullshit!

guess that's why some people would"never go back"...and vow that they will die in europe...

Has anyone noticed whenever they talk about aids epidemic in africa on the news, it's always the same poeple talking about it; news reporters, "devout Catholics", celebrities, and interestingly african "doctors", but never actually medical scientist or CEO's Chairman, employees of "top" multi billion dollar pharmaceutical companies like merck, Pfizer or GlaxoSmithKline.

Does anyone remember what happened to that doctor who claimed that mother of 3 100% murdered her children and offered his "expert" opinion on other same relating cases which lead to the conviction of other mothers and found his claims to be false. They bury the man. The same could happen to these pharmaceutical companies if they offer "expert" analysis on aids which are found to be false, so they simply don't, but let the media sing it's tune and speak no evil, see no evil, hear no evil.

I get it. So when a African die from one disease that is within AIDS it is counted as a death from that disease along with a death from the AIDS disease. So the statistics would make it is seem like more than one person has died.

Do I have the total right overstanding?

rammcsnake wrote: An African patient can become an AIDS statistic if (1) a doctor notices "two major signs associated with at least one minor sign," and (2) he chooses not to attribute the illness to other causes such as cancer or severe malnutrition. African physicians usually don't make this choice. The reason, as pointed out by Celia Farber describing her findings from a trip to Africa, is that every diagnosed AIDS case converts to money in the hands of African health agencies.[sup]5[/sup] Financial assistance for AIDS is distributed to different countries by WHO on a capitation basis: more cases attract more dollars.
In the British Medical Journal, Charles Gilks reported his study of case histories diagnosed as AIDS in Nairobi. His conclusion was that only 30% of them would be considered AIDS cases by CDC criteria in the US. He also concluded that the WHO definition was "inherently unworkable and incorrect." [sup]6[/sup] The application of this definition in Africa has provided major support for the construction of the fraudulent statistics used to frighten heterosexual Americans.

I thank you for posting this.

We often times think that the way they count statistics in one country(U.S.) is the way that it is done worldwide not to say the U.S. is not somewhat responsible at least for that misconception and the ways of some other countries. We as Blacks should know better by now.

Has anyone read this book?

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/089...Fencoding=UTF8

Inventing the AIDS Virus

It's interesting reading the comments about this book also, there are over 80 responses. One of the viewers rightful pointed out that many of the rest of the viewer comments that beleive this book is false have never quoted the book to prove that they've actually read it to begin with. Thus you get lazy 1 liners with very low helpful ratings on opposed viewer of the book.

http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/aids_afr.html

africa.upenn.edu wrote:
Dr. Yuichi Shiokawa and Nathan Clumeck may as well be sympathetic Nazi/KKK "scientific expert".

[align=center]Anyone remember this guy

Bill Bennett

http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006[/align]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2995779.stm

Well I am all one for conspiracy theories......African people have been carrying on with the same sexual practice as they have done since man began....now all of a sudden this epidemic has taken over and is killing millions???? Stinks of genocide to me.... the aids virus was deliberately planted in Africa to wipe out an entire race...... mark my words...in time we will find out the truth... AND THEN THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY!!